May 9th, 2007
|06:25 am - Yellow and Black|
According to J.K. Rowling's newly updated website, Nymphadora Tonks is a Hufflepuff.
Thereby shooting down any fanon conception of her as a "good" Slytherin.
(Now you know why I'm on a writing hiatus until after "Deathly Hallows" comes out!)
It's not that I have an issue with Hufflepuffs nor even really with her being one.
It's just that she, as a member of the House of Black, reknowned for putting out generations of Slytherins, was widely seen among fans as the likely sole example of a "good" Slytherin. Snape's tainted by Dumbledore's death and Slughorn is a posterboy for venality at best. Draco may be a dud as a Death Eater, but he still tried repeatedly to kill Dumbledore, even if Severus had to finally do it for him.
To me, this just underlines the "Slytherin = Evil" equation that has run through the series to date. Unless the last book has Lucius redeeming himself by switching sides and Severus being somehow loyal to Dumbledore, the message I get is that the Sorting Hat can determine that an 11-year-old child is likely to turn out to be a bad egg -- and possibly a VERY bad egg indeed.
So much for Dumbledore's assertations that "it is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities" and "it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be."
Given this, I'm surprised the Wizarding World doesn't set up a gas chamber in the backyard of Hogwarts to get rid of all the little snakes as soon as they're Sorted. Save everyone a whole lot of bother, now wouldn't it? "The only good Slytherin is a DEAD Slytherin" and all that.
~~ wants to throw rotten tomatoes at Rowling ~~
Current Mood: irate
Current Music: "The Voice Within (Dark Inception)" by Sintz
Tommy's a half-blood too, so it may not even be that rare an event. Maybe every year there are one or two who get Sorted into Slytherin and we simply haven't been told about any that are in Harry's class. Nobody knew much about Blaise Zabini until HBP, now did they?
I don't hate Nymphadora, I just don't think Rowling has given readers enough about the relationship between her and Remus to make it plausible. It reads more like an infatuation with a "safe" older man who has enough of an air of danger around him to make him both attractive to her and repellent to her family -- something of a "two-fer" for a rebellious post-adolescent who is still not quite sure of her identity as an adult. Remus has good reason to be dubious about it, since she may end up breaking his heart as well as her own when she realizes he's not quite what she thought he was and it might be more than she wants to be saddled with long-term.
I don't particularly mind that's she's a Hufflepuff, per se. It's more that Rowling has stacked the deck so much against Slytherins, since alone of all the houses, you can't find one truly "good" one in the books. As mentioned above, Severus is tainted and Slughorn is portrayed as a living example of a number of sins, particularly Gluttony and Greed. If Tonks had been a Slytherin, there would have been at least one role model for young readers to look up to who happen to identify with that house. As it is, when you look at the Slytherins as a set, it's no wonder the Weasley twins hissed at the little firsties who Sorted there. (Which I personally thought was reprehensible conduct on their part.)
At this point, I tend to think of Rowling as being about as subtle as a baseball bat to the head. I think Snape was somewhat of an accident and I'm not sure she knows what to make of him and his legions of fans. The impression she gives in various interviews is that she's quite taken aback by the popularity of Severus and the Malfoys and is especially appalled by the fans of Tommy and the Death Eaters. She doesn't seem to comprehend that these characters that she wrote to be "bad guys" appeal to anyone who's even been a social outcast or misfit (which is almost everyone, at some point in life), because they are so easy to identify with if you've ever spent time on the outside of the "in" crowd.